FREE PREVIEW
|
LOGIN OR SUBSCRIBE NOW TO READ THIS ARTICLE
|
A small victory: SCOTUS looks at injury in fact in Spokeo
|
Case Law, Consumer Protection
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
|
|
In a 6-2 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, determining that a plaintiff cannot satisfy the Constitution’s Article III standing requirements by alleging a bare procedural violation but that a plaintiff must satisfy the injury-in-fact requirements by demonstrating both particularity and concreteness, even under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Read on to learn more.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
|
|
Already a subscriber?
Problems logging in?
Please call 330-659-6101 x 805 or email us for assistance.
|
|
Today's other top stories